Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 22:47:22
Message-ID: 201001292247.o0TMlMd13333@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote:
> On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > > 
> > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
> > > all.
> > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items.  This
> > is a work item, and not a small one.
> What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?

You mean turned on by default, right?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-29 22:54:15
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-01-29 22:46:35
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group