Andres Freund wrote:
> On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > >
> > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
> > > all.
> > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This
> > is a work item, and not a small one.
> What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?
You mean turned on by default, right?
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-29 22:54:15|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-01-29 22:46:35|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings|