Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 21:01:37
Message-ID: 201001292101.o0TL1b002310@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> (4) The 8.3 issue wasn't nearly as bad as Tom is making it out to be.
> Yes, there was a lot of WTF going on, but only by people that aren't
> paying attention anyway and the work to fix it was pretty nominal.

The big mistake we made in 8.3 is not having those compatibility
functions that Peter created ready _at_ _release_ _time_.  I believe
that was pure sloppiness on our part.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-29 21:03:03
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-01-29 20:58:55
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group