Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2010-01-28 09:21:43
Message-ID: 20100128182143.9795.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:

> The attached patch uses one TOC entry for each blob objects.

When I'm testing the new patch, I found "ALTER LARGE OBJECT" command
returns "ALTER LARGEOBJECT" tag. Should it be "ALTER LARGE(space)OBJECT"
instead?  As I remember, we had decided not to use LARGEOBJECT
(without a space) in user-visible messages, right?

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tim BunceDate: 2010-01-28 09:25:51
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-01-28 09:21:08
Subject: Re: Review: Typed Table

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group