Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> wrote:
> Anyone? I'd like some feedback before moving on to do the seq scan + sort in those
> CLUSTER cases where "use_index_scan" returns false...
+1 for CLUSTER using sort.
I have a couple of comments for the current implementation:
* Do we need to disable sort-path for tables clustered on a gist index?
* I'd prefer to separate cost calculation routines from create_index_path()
and cost_sort(), rather than using a dummy planner.
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2010-01-21 08:35:55|
|Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2010-01-21 08:31:14|
|Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)|