Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Uh, do we really want to call this "replication" rather than archive log
> > streaming or something.  It seems "replication" is a generic term and
> > will confuse people who are using other replication solutions like
> > Slony.
> 
> Good question. OTOH, if we move the sections about setting up a
> file-shipping based standby with pg_standby, that's not streaming.
> 
> What we have now is:

Frankly, I am concerned we now have a "replication" CVS subdirectory; 
it looks more like a 'wal_streaming' directory to me.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• Re: Streaming replication, loose ends at 2010-01-15 17:29:36 from Heikki Linnakangas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2010-01-16 03:22:23
	Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-01-16 00:40:08
	Subject: Re: Mammoth in Core?