Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Date: 2010-01-16 03:22:02
Message-ID: 201001160322.o0G3M2j10929@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Uh, do we really want to call this "replication" rather than archive log
> > streaming or something.  It seems "replication" is a generic term and
> > will confuse people who are using other replication solutions like
> > Slony.
> 
> Good question. OTOH, if we move the sections about setting up a
> file-shipping based standby with pg_standby, that's not streaming.
> 
> What we have now is:

Frankly, I am concerned we now have a "replication" CVS subdirectory; 
it looks more like a 'wal_streaming' directory to me.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-01-16 03:22:23
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-16 00:40:08
Subject: Re: Mammoth in Core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group