Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Uh, do we really want to call this "replication" rather than archive log
> > streaming or something. It seems "replication" is a generic term and
> > will confuse people who are using other replication solutions like
> > Slony.
> Good question. OTOH, if we move the sections about setting up a
> file-shipping based standby with pg_standby, that's not streaming.
> What we have now is:
Frankly, I am concerned we now have a "replication" CVS subdirectory;
it looks more like a 'wal_streaming' directory to me.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-01-16 03:22:23|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-16 00:40:08|
|Subject: Re: Mammoth in Core? |