* Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> [100115 15:20]:
> Ok. I'll look at splitting walreceiver code between the shared module
> and backend binary slightly differently. At first glance, it doesn't
> seem that hard after all, and will make the code more modular anyway.
Maybe an insane question, but why can postmaster just not "exec"
walreceiver? I mean, because of windows, we already have that code
around, and then walreceiver could link directly to libpq and not have
to worry at all about linking all of postmaster backends to libpq...
But I do understand that's a radical change...
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-01-15 20:32:56|
|Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions|
|Previous:||From: James William Pye||Date: 2010-01-15 20:26:13|
|Subject: Re: plpython3|