Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> I agree. ?My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding
> >> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the
> >> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. ?If the tree were in a releasable
> >> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it.
> > You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
> > instead.
> I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message
> with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big,
> outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree.
> Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I
> accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
Agreed that "it's a tacit decision to slip the release". If HS and SR
had been tested and stable in October we might have had a chance for
June, but at this point it seems very unlikely.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-01-12 18:05:02|
|Subject: Re: damage control mode|
|Previous:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2010-01-12 17:58:42|
|Subject: Re: Typed tables|