Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > We could if we could all stop long enough to address them. ?I think
> > there is the feeling that a great idea will pop up eventually, and only
> > when we are looking at beta do we realize we are out of time, and the
> > hard, sometime distasteful/ugly, decisions have to be made.
> I think there's definitely some truth to that. It's basically a
> project management issue: how do we make sure that decisions get made
> on a way forward in a timely fashion? Of course, you already know my
> opinion: the first thing we need is a good list of what the issues
> are. :-)
> >> > What amazes me is how many people who closely follow our development are
> >> > mystified by what we do during that pre-beta period.
> >> Hey, I'm still mystified. ?Maybe you and Tom could do twice-a-week
> >> status updates on what you're working on and anything you could use
> >> help with, or something.
> > Yea, that would probably help. ?I know I am not very transparent in this
> > area.
> Just my opinion: I think it would be awesome.
I tried publishing my email box but it we heavily criticized. The
problem is that the status of the items is very fluid and I don't have
much time to update status because I am usually spending time trying to
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-01-12 02:59:20|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication status|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-12 02:50:45|
|Subject: Re: damage control mode|