Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-12 00:54:00
Message-ID: 201001120054.o0C0s0r06606@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat wrote:
> > Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something*
> > on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally
> > considered to be beta quality.  I don't think that really helps
> > much though; it just means we need more time in beta.
> >
> 
> There are three reasons I'd probably be comfortable with that; 1) the CF 
> process means we've likely had more eyes on the code going in than in past 
> releases.

The reality check is that was had commit-fests for 8.4 development and
8.4.0 had more easily-identified bugs than most of our previous .0
releases which didn't use commit-fests.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-01-12 00:54:31
Subject: Re: Compression Library and Usages
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-01-12 00:52:51
Subject: Re: damage control mode

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group