Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-08 18:13:49
Message-ID: 201001081913.49663.andres@anarazel.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Friday 08 January 2010 19:07:16 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think so, too, but I'm actually afraid that if we don't start making
> > some tough decisions soon it's going to be even later than that.  I'm
> > dismayed by the number of people who seem to think that the current
> > schedule is not already tight.
> 
> Perhaps they are now dissuaded.  ;-)
> 
> I think once HS and SR are in CVS we could easily be pushed back, but it
> seems at least some people are willing to accept that.  The only other
> option is to keep them for 8.6 and let them be tested during a full
> development cycle.
Thats quite similar to where 8.5 started...

Andres

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-01-08 18:18:45
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-01-08 18:09:54
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group