Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
> >> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader.
> > I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been
> > part of autoconf?
> It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in
> really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit
> it, you just generate it.
Well, that's pretty confusing considering it has a .in suffix, just like
configure.in, which we do edit, but I get your point.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2009-12-31 18:56:05|
|Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2009-12-31 18:43:05|
|Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking|