Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Date: 2009-12-14 00:55:48
Message-ID: 20091214095548.8A7D.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> OK, done, see attached. I also noticed when looking through this that
> the documentation says that auto_explain.log_buffers is ignored unless
> auto_explain.log_analyze is set. That is true and seems right to me,
> but for some reason explain_ExecutorEnd() had been changed to set
> es.analyze if either log_analyze or log_buffers was set.

Thanks. It was my bug.

Could you apply the patch? Or, may I do by myself?

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-14 01:30:38 Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2009-12-14 00:40:29 Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)