Tom Lane wrote:

> I just spent a bit of time considering what we might do to fix this.
> The idea mentioned in the above thread was to switch over to using
> wchar_t in the regex code, but that seems to have a number of problems.
> One showstopper is that on some platforms wchar_t is only 16 bits and
> can't represent the full range of Unicode characters.  I don't want to
> fix case-folding only to break regexes for other uses.

We have a TODO item about having a regex specific data type.  Would
implementing that solve this problem?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

• A thought about regex versus multibyte character sets at 2009-11-30 18:15:06 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: A thought about regex versus multibyte character sets at 2009-12-01 21:52:26 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2009-12-01 21:49:06
	Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:	From: Marko Kreen	Date: 2009-12-01 21:30:53
	Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4