On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:14:54AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > I wrote a hackish little script that checks if all rules in ecpg.addons are
> > indeed used to create the precompiler's parser to catch renamed symbol and
> > similar changes. Now I wonder whether this should be added to the build
> > process. If it is, the buildfarm will catch every such change, not just the
> > ones breaking the regression tests. However, this might also make the buildfarm
> > become red if only a very minor and unimportant change is not syncronized.
> > Any comment?
> The point of the buildfarm is to catch mistakes ...
Okay, committed. As you guys know I don't really speak perl, so feel free to go
in and fix whatever stupid perl mistake I made.
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-11-27 13:39:43|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-11-27 08:28:07|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby and cancelling idle queries|