Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Correct place for merchandising issues

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: Correct place for merchandising issues
Date: 2009-11-12 23:44:20
Message-ID: 20091112234419.GO4780@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:05:32 -0800 Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> > Actually I would argue that for eu related merchandising it is
> > absolutely appropriate. EU/US (and other regions) are going to be
> > relatively autonomous in their needs outside of content (such as source
> > for flyers).
> 
> Even if EU and US are autonomous (which isn't absolutely true) - what
> about other countries and continents? Do we want to establish separate 
> processes in each and every country, for each conference as example? Or
> wouldn't it better to have a contact where one can ask for promotion and
> merchandising material?

I agree that having one list for merchandising seems the right way to go
about it.  If a certain portion of the traffic is not applicable to you,
just don't read it.  That's how all mailing lists work.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-12 23:58:24
Subject: Re: Correct place for merchandising issues
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-11-12 23:37:40
Subject: Re: Correct place for merchandising issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group