Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-11-12 19:49:39
Message-ID: 20091112194939.GI4780@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera írta:

> > I have applied this patch after some tinkering. I mainly added support
> > for "fetch_args: FORWARD opt_from_in name" and "BACKWARD opt_from_in
> > name" in ecpg.addons which apparently you forgot.
>
> Thanks. Your fix is correct if this patch is considered
> standalone. This means I have to re-post the later
> patches to fix the reject this fix causes in them.

Yeah. BTW I don't think the rest of the pieces in this series make
sense to apply separately, because they don't do anything useful by
themselves (one of them introduces an unused function, what good is in
that?). I think they should be submitted as a single patch.

If you want to submit patches in a series like this one, they need to be
considered standalone, I think. The Linux kernel devs work differently
than us here.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-11-12 19:52:20 Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-11-12 19:46:54 Re: array_to_string bug?