Tom Lane escribió:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Still far from convinced on that one. But effective_io_concurrency
> > should be included even in the first pass.
> I think a design that is limited to a prespecified set of GUCs is
> broken by definition. It'd be better to make it work like
> ALTER DATABASE SET.
Well, not exactly like ALTER DATABASE SET because those are now stored
in pg_db_role_setting. But a new spcoptions column storing an array of
key/value pairs seems a reasonable way to do it.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Itagaki Takahiro||Date: 2009-10-27 00:20:46|
|Subject: Re: "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized?|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2009-10-26 23:47:56|
|Subject: Re: per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost|