Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments?and 8.4 and slon 1.2?

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments?and 8.4 and slon 1.2?
Date: 2009-10-13 12:53:55
Message-ID: 20091013125355.GE29438@it.is.rice.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:03:10AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Any issues, has it baked long enough, is it time for us 8.3 folks to deal
> > with the pain and upgrade?
> 
> I am running 8.4.1 for my stats and search databases, and it's working fine.
> 
> > Anymore updates regarding 8.4 and slon 1.2 as well, since I usually
> > build/upgrade both at the same time.
> 
> I don't think 1.2 supports 8.4 just yet, and 2.0.3  or so is still not
> stable enough for production (I had major unexplained outages with it)
> so for now, no 8.4 with slony.
> 
slony-1.2.17-rc2 works fine with version 8.4 in my limited testing.
I have not been able to get replication to work reliably with any
current release of slony-2.x. There was a recent comment that the
latest version in CVS has the 2.x bug fixed but I have not had a
chance to try.

Regards,
Ken


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Shaul DarDate: 2009-10-13 15:17:10
Subject: Getting a random row
Previous:From: Jacques CaronDate: 2009-10-13 10:10:15
Subject: Re: index on two tables or Howto speedup max/aggregate-function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group