| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "\"David E(dot) Wheeler\"" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: latest hstore patch |
| Date: | 2009-10-02 15:06:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200910021506.n92F6JH14345@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> > I intentionally avoided hstore_to_array because it would be unclear
> > which one it meant (the 1-d or 2-d result).
>
> hstore_to_list seems like a pretty horrible name though for something
> that produces an array. I also note that "array" means "1-D array"
> according to no less an authority than the SQL standard ;-). I think
> we could live with hstore_to_array and hstore_to_matrix. Thoughts,
> other ideas?
Off topic, but in normal English usage I thought 'vector' was a 1-D
array, and an array could be any number of dimensions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-10-02 15:07:21 | Re: latest hstore patch |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-10-02 15:04:10 | Re: Hot Standby on git |