Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-10-01 02:11:46
Message-ID: 20091001110804.9C33.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather
> hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32
> only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go
> with the win32-only one for now?

Yes, because Windows is only platform that supports UTF-16 encoding natively.
I believe my patch is the best solution for Windows even if we have another
approach for other platforms.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-10-01 02:17:01 Re: [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-01 02:08:12 Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf?