Re: Large fixed-width text

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large fixed-width text
Date: 2009-09-29 03:05:16
Message-ID: 200909290305.n8T35Gk16638@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Oh, ok, I know they affect mail body in archives and all I said is true -
> > they are overwritten by other rules in most browsers and the text is huge in
> > browsers where they're not overwritten. I think better default would be
> > 120%, it may still look big somewhere but not as big as it does now and it
> > compensates for that monospace vs normal font default size.
>
> Just to take this off on a slight tangent... You seem pretty
> well-versed in CSS, right? ;) Any chance we can convince you to try to
> do some cleanup work on our CSS, structuring it nicer and also getting
> some comments in there so us mere mortals can understand it? That
> would be a *very* welcome piece of help!
>
> If you are, please contact me off-list before you start actually
> working, I have some partial pieces of work you'll be interested in
> :-)

Yes, please. I just finished reading a book about CSS so I understand
the syntax, but obviously not the historical quirks. I would like to be
involved as well.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Selena Deckelmann 2009-09-29 03:23:42 Re: Forcing wrapping of 'pre' text in the archives
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-09-29 03:04:09 Re: Large fixed-width text