Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> CommitFest 2009-09 is now only days away! I have been having
> discussions with a number of people, and the result of those
> discussions is that I have agreed to manage the next CommitFest
> insofar as patch assignment is concerned. Selena Deckelmann,
> Stephen Frost, and Brendan Jurd have agreed to assist with what
> we're calling patch-chasing: that is, making sure that discussions
> around a patch don't die, and that it gets marked as Commited,
> Returned with Feedback, or Rejected in a timely fashion, so that the
> CommitFest overall gets closed out in a timely fashion. We're
> tentatively looking at dividing up responsibility for patch-chasing
> by topic, as follows:
>
> Brendan Jurd: SQL Features, Procedural Languages Stephen Frost:
> Security, Contrib, Miscellaneous Selena Deckelmann: Performance,
> Clients
>
> Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel
> free to reply here.
>
> And that brings me to the next topic. Although I have received many
> endorsements of the way that I managed the last CommitFest, for
> which I am grateful, I think that the real key to a good CommitFest
> is to have a good group of reviewers. We had an excellent group of
> reviewers for the last CommitFest and I am hoping that all of those
> people will volunteer again. Of course, we also need new reviewers!
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch

I'm in :)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate