Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date: 2009-08-31 21:00:20
Message-ID: 20090831210020.GL6060@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
> > BTW, currently, the default ACL of largeobject allows anything for owner
> > and nothing for world. Do you have any comment for the default behavior?
>
> Mph. I think the backlash will be too great. You have to leave the
> default behavior the same as it is now, ie, world access.

BTW as a default it is pretty bad. Should we have a GUC var to set the
default LO permissions?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-08-31 21:42:16 Re: autovacuum launcher using InitPostgres
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-08-31 20:41:45 Re: [PATCH] plpythonu datatype conversion improvements