Re: Trac tickets

Le vendredi 7 août 2009 à 13:35:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:48, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Guillaume
> >
> > Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >> Le jeudi 6 août 2009 à 13:10:24, Dave Page a écrit :
> >>> Why are trac tickets being created for the recent change history?
> >>> That's what the changelog and svn history is for...
> >>
> >> Yes. I created them to try to use the roadmap system. See this:
> >>
> >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/roadmap
> >> and this:
> >>
> >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/query?milestone=1.10.1&order=priority&col=
> >>id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=compone
> >>nt (which is kind of a changelog and a todo list)
> >
> > OK, well if you want to start maintaining this, please have a think
> > about how we can modify the existing processes to accomodate it. At
> > the very least, I would like to avoid the changelog duplication - can
> > we drop that file, or auto-create it for example?
>
> Yes, we should definitely be able to do that. However, I think we
> should do *both* for a while just to fill things with some data, so we
> can reasonably compare the outcome. yes, it means duplicated work
> during that time, but as long as we have the end-goal to drop one of
> the two.

Dropping one is not enough. We need to have more. And trac gives us more than
just a changelog. So, I agree with Magnus. We should really check that trac
works great enough for us before dropping any existing processes.

--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com