From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <petere(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building This switches |
Date: | 2009-08-04 23:43:19 |
Message-ID: | 20090804234319.GV6494@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building
>
> This switches the man page building process to use the DocBook XSL stylesheet
> toolchain. The previous targets for Docbook2X are removed. configure has been
> updated to look for the new tools. The Documentation appendix contains the
> new build instructions. There are also a few isolated tweaks in the
> documentation to improve places that came out strangely in the man pages.
Excellent work, thanks.
I'm wondering if dropping SPI_* manpages is really what we want. Maybe
we could add them to man section 3? I know I've wanted to have them a
couple of times.
Not sure about dblink.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-05 10:50:10 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building This switches |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-04 22:04:37 | pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building This switches |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-05 10:50:10 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building This switches |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-04 22:04:37 | pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building This switches |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-04 23:55:39 | Re: the case for machine-readable error fields |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-04 23:32:42 | Re: the case for machine-readable error fields |