Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bitplatforms

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bitplatforms
Date: 2009-07-24 21:35:18
Message-ID: 20090724213518.GM23840@tamriel.snowman.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter,

* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts 
> whether this patch actually does anything.  Foremost, it doesn't touch the 
> definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like 
> this.

Do you need access to a Win64 box?  I can provide you access to a
Win64 system, which Dave Page and Magnus already have access to, if it
would be useful..

	Thanks,

		Stephen

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-07-24 21:35:50
Subject: Re: explain refactoring v4
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-07-24 21:28:10
Subject: contrib/xml2 pfree bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group