Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-07-24 21:35:18
Message-ID: 20090724213518.GM23840@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter,

* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts
> whether this patch actually does anything. Foremost, it doesn't touch the
> definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like
> this.

Do you need access to a Win64 box? I can provide you access to a
Win64 system, which Dave Page and Magnus already have access to, if it
would be useful..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-07-24 21:35:50 Re: explain refactoring v4
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-07-24 21:28:10 contrib/xml2 pfree bug