Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: git revisited

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git revisited
Date: 2009-07-21 13:21:43
Message-ID: 200907211621.44187.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Monday 20 July 2009 23:17:30 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I'm not sure where we got to with doing some surgery on the CVS repo so
> that we can replicate all the tags and branches properly. Has someone
> fully identified what needs to be fixed so we can have all the tags?

I think this depends on which tool we would end up using to do the final 
conversion.  Each tool has its own quirks.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-21 13:46:25
Subject: Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-07-21 13:13:41
Subject: Re: Sampling profiler updated

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group