Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 10:12:37, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Guillaume
> Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 19:06:50, Dave Page a écrit :
> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Guillaume
> >> Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >> > The latter. I don't see a way to catch them all easily. I'll commit
> >> > this, and try to find a way to catch the others.
> >> Good luck with that. We use multi-sentence statements in practically
> >> every SQL dialogue to group together commands like "CREATE xxx; ALTER
> >> xxx; COMMENT ON xxx;" to run everything as one transaction without
> >> explicitly starting or ending one. Changing that would require some
> >> fairly invasive changes.
> > Hmmmm. You're right. I don't know why I didn't think about this. Should I
> > revert my patch? it doesn't do any good (and no bad AFAICT).
> The downside is an extra roundtrip. If it doesn't help, let's back it out.
OK, I will do.
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: svn||Date: 2009-07-21 08:38:19|
|Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r7977 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/schema|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2009-07-21 08:20:30|
|Subject: Re: Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin3 Version 1.10.0 : Crash when configuring an pgAgent job|