Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Archives no longer obscure email addresses?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Archives no longer obscure email addresses?
Date: 2009-07-19 15:43:39
Message-ID: 20090719154339.GB4938@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Tom Lane wrote:
> The (at) and (dot) hackery in email addresses seems to have stopped
> getting applied in recent mail archive entries.  Older ones still have
> it.  Compare for instance
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01089.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-04/msg01434.php

Ugh :-(  Most likely this is due to the changes I did the other day to
the code to avoid mangling message-ids.

I'll have a look as soon as I'm back home, and I'll also try to restore
the link to the plain/text version of each email, which was also broken
at that time I think.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Gabriele BartoliniDate: 2009-07-20 08:03:55
Subject: Re: 2 training events waiting for approval
Previous:From: Guido BarosioDate: 2009-07-18 18:42:07
Subject: Re: 2 training events waiting for approval

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group