Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-06 13:09:07
Message-ID: 200907061309.n66D97420086@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
> > confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
> > actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
> > anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
> >
>
> yeah! i was wondering about the very same thing... what's the
> usefulness for maintaining a sf.net project?

I don't know, but as long as it exists we should keep it current. Do we
want to remove it?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-07-06 13:38:33 Re: Sourceforge PG release
Previous Message Robert Treat 2009-07-06 12:47:21 Re: Remove support company