Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO items

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO items
Date: 2009-07-02 21:52:21
Message-ID: 20090702215221.GO4698@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>   
>>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>>>>       
>>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>>> those items to it?
>>
>> For historical record I could see benefit.
>
> Doesn't the wiki keep a page history?

Yes, but it is not as convenient.


> I don't see much point in keeping  the old items in a current page.

It is useful to point out to people: look at all the things we did in 8.4!

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2009-07-02 21:54:52
Subject: Re: TODO items
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2009-07-02 21:50:50
Subject: Re: First CommitFest: July 15th

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group