Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>> If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we
> >>> can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch
> >>> author to resolve, and there would be little slippage;  the same goes
> >>> for dealing with known bugs.  I know it can be done, but I don't promise
> >>> it would be pleasant.
> >> 
> >> In other words, you propose dropping the idea of commitfests, and
> >> expecting committers to spend *all* their time reviewing?  Tain't
> >> happening.
> 
> > "I don't promise it would be pleasant."
> 
> I'm not sure which part of "no" you didn't understand, but this
> committer is not buying into that proposal.

Again, I am pointing out it could be done, but it would be unpleasant,
as you mentioned.  We can't move make progress unless we understand the
underlying causes of our delays.  I am not suggesting we adopt it for
reasons you mentioned.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• Re: 8.5 development schedule at 2009-07-02 02:34:15 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2009-07-02 03:15:22
	Subject: Re: First CommitFest: July 15th
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2009-07-02 02:34:15
	Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule