Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 development schedule

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Date: 2009-07-02 02:31:56
Message-ID: 200907020231.n622Vua04186@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> > If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we
> > can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch
> > author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; ?the same goes
> > for dealing with known bugs. ?I know it can be done, but I don't promise
> > it would be pleasant.
> 
> Also agreed.  It's never pleasant to have a patch rejected/postponed,
> but it's tolerable if you've gotten some feedback and understand the
> reasons why.  Of course there is no guarantee that you will agree with
> those reasons, but that's life.  Some day you may be the committer and
> have your turn to irritate patch submitters.  :-)

Our only limitation is our own sense that we have been fair to patch
authors, i.e. there is no external restriction on how we handle things.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-07-02 02:32:28
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-07-02 02:29:58
Subject: Re: HEAD is open for 8.5 development

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group