Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:07:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think this is pretty much nonsense --- most queries run all their plan
> >> nodes concurrently to some extent. You can't usefully say that a query
> >> is "on" some node, nor measure progress by whether some node is "done".
> > What about showing the outermost node where work has started?
> That's always the outermost node; what would it tell you?
[ Repost ]
I think the only resonable solution would be to consider the estimated
cost of each node and then compute what percentage complete each node
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fly.Li||Date: 2009-07-02 01:49:48|
|Subject: Re: gin--a rule for function parameter|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-07-02 00:51:04|
|Subject: Re: pg_migrator versus inherited columns|