* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> As I mentioned in the core discussion, I'm a bit concerned that this
> would have the effect of choking off development too soon. We could
> have a situation where nothing major is supposed to be getting worked
> on from Nov 15 to mid-May, which seems much too long. So "very small"
> seems too strict. Robert's suggestion of a 1000-line cutoff might be
> workable though.
Maybe we should have a hard rule now, but then leave ourselves the
option to relax it (perhaps not publically) once we actually get to the
last CF? I dunno, just a thought. I do share your concern about not
choking off development for too long, but it sure seems like we've
always got a big patch or two that we're trying to get into the next
release near the end..
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-07-01 01:57:44|
|Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2009-07-01 01:12:27|
|Subject: [PATCH] SE-PostgreSQL Updates rev.2096|