Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Date: 2009-06-28 21:38:20
Message-ID: 20090628213820.GU21081@fetter.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 05:27:19PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> David Fetter wrote:
>>   
>>>  * Users who come from MySQL every once in a while, annoyed that
>>>  we don't support "GRANT ... *" syntax.
>>>     
>>
>> I'm missing what's wrong with a wild-card GRANT syntax for this
>> case.
>
> Without a major change in the way we do permissions, it will not
> work  prospectively.  We have no way ATM to store permissions for an
> object  that does not currently exist.

There have been previous discussions of prospective permissions
changes.  Are we restarting them here?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2009-06-28 21:57:51
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-06-28 21:27:19
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group