| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: security checks for largeobjects? |
| Date: | 2009-06-22 14:18:51 |
| Message-ID: | 200906221718.51670.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > The todo list says, as follows:
> > > * Binary Data
> > > o Add security checks for large objects
> > >
> > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data
> > >
> > > Is anyone working on? or interested in?
> >
> > OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item.
> > I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle.
>
> This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion. Perhaps the
> TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one.
MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal,
no?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-06-22 14:20:51 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-22 14:16:15 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |