On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > > The todo list says, as follows:
> > > > * Binary Data
> > > > o Add security checks for large objects
> > > >
> > > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone working on? or interested in?
> > >
> > > OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item.
> > > I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle.
> > This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion. Perhaps the
> > TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one.
> MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal,
It depends on your definition. The lo interface is pretty much to
objects on the file system directly.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-06-22 15:24:10|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2009-06-22 15:18:42|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?|