Re: security checks for largeobjects?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: security checks for largeobjects?
Date: 2009-06-22 13:24:44
Message-ID: 20090622132444.GD30499@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > The todo list says, as follows:
> > * Binary Data
> > o Add security checks for large objects
> >
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data
> >
> > Is anyone working on? or interested in?
>
> OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item.
> I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle.

This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion. Perhaps the
TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-22 14:16:15 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-06-22 08:20:51 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?