Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> Yes, but the point is you want an exact replica of CVS right? You're
> git repo should have $PostgreSQL$ and the cvs export/checkout (you do
> use -kk right) should also have $PostgreSQL$.
> The 3 parsecvs errors were that it *didn't* recognoze the strange
> $PostgreSQL ... Exp $ expansion that cvs did.
Huh, no -- I agree that $OpenBSD$ etc should remain (we don't munge them
anyway), but $PostgreSQL$, $Id$, $Revision$ etc tags are best gone
because, as Markus says, their expansion interferes with content hashing.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Field||Date: 2009-05-29 15:48:19|
|Subject: Re: plperl error format vs plpgsql error format vs pgTAP|
|Previous:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2009-05-29 15:39:18|
|Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type|