Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date: 2009-05-29 08:06:28
Message-ID: 200905291106.28707.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Friday 29 May 2009 04:26:35 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Added to TODO:
> 	|Improve bytea COPY format
>
> 	* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00192.php

Btw., I have started to write some code for that.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-05-29 08:12:05
Subject: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2009-05-29 07:16:08
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group