| From: | Kevin Kempter <kevink(at)consistentstate(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering |
| Date: | 2009-05-27 19:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200905271341.40135.kevink@consistentstate.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 13:33:55 Alan McKay wrote:
> > Continuent works (AFAIK) like pgpool clustering, it sends the same
> > statements to both/all servers in the cluster but it has no insight to
> > the servers beyond this, so if via a direct connection server A becomes
> > out of sync with server B then continuent is oblivious.
>
> So can the same be said for pgpool then?
Yes
>
>
> thanks,
> -Alan
>
> --
> “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”
> - Glenn Prickett
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Kempter | 2009-05-27 19:44:18 | Favorite/Recommended ERD tools |
| Previous Message | Alan McKay | 2009-05-27 19:33:55 | Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-05-27 19:54:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering |
| Previous Message | Alan McKay | 2009-05-27 19:33:55 | Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering |