Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

superlative missuse

From: Angel Alvarez <clist(at)uah(dot)es>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: superlative missuse
Date: 2009-05-12 21:53:27
Message-ID: 200905122353.28049.clist@uah.es (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Dear List mates,

more optimal plan... 
morreoptimal configuration...

we suffer a 'more optimal' superlative missuse

there is  not so 'more optimal' thing but a simple 'better' thing.

im not native english speaker but i think it still applies.

Well this a superlative list so all of you deserve a better "optimal" use.

Regards, Angel
-- 
Este correo no tiene dibujos. Las formas extra├▒as en la pantalla son letras.
->>-----------------------------------------------
    Clist UAH a.k.a Angel
---------------------------------[www.uah.es]-<<--

...being the second biggest search engine in the world is good enough for us. Peter @ Pirate Bay.

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-05-12 22:41:00
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous:From: Thomas FinneidDate: 2009-05-12 21:52:23
Subject: increase index performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group