| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GiST index changes |
| Date: | 2009-05-05 14:24:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200905051424.n45EOmY05965@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> bruce wrote:
> > Has the on-disk format changed for GiST indexes? I know it has for hash
> > and GIN indexes.
>
> Sorry, I should have clarified: did the GiST index on-disk format change
> between Postgres 8.3 and 8.4.
Would someone please answer my question: Did the GiST index on-disk
format change between Postgres 8.3 and 8.4?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-05-05 14:35:14 | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-05 14:20:38 | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |