Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009 20:20:29 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I updated the text to:
> > >
> > > The following functions return XML Schema documents similar to the
> > > mappings produced by the corresponding functions above:
> OK, that is what is in our SGML now.
> > Sorry, that is completely wrong.
> You did just email "sounds good", but were mistaken, right?
But that was to Tom proposal, which is completely different (yes -- one
word can change the meaning of a sentence).
I agree the paragraph (even with Tom's rework) is a bit confusing to the
uninitiated. Maybe the subsection could be reflowed so that each
function is described along the corresponding XML Schema function (to
table_to_xml and table_to_xmlschema, later query_to_xml and
query_to_xmlschema and so on).
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2009-04-27 20:02:32|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments forfirst two parts of documentation|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-04-27 19:56:28|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation|