Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:20:29 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I updated the text to:
> > The following functions return XML Schema documents similar to the
> > mappings produced by the corresponding functions above:
OK, that is what is in our SGML now.
> Sorry, that is completely wrong.
You did just email "sounds good", but were mistaken, right?
> Are you aware of what "XML Schema" is? Should that perhaps be explained in
> the docs?
Uh, it would be nice to explain it, yes. My guess it that the paragraph
is much too short and needs perhaps an addtional sentence, but I have no
clue what it should be.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2009-04-27 18:54:12|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments forfirst two parts of documentation|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-04-27 18:50:13|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation|