Re: XML documentation question

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: XML documentation question
Date: 2009-04-27 18:52:48
Message-ID: 200904271852.n3RIqmO00786@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:20:29 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I updated the text to:
> >
> > The following functions return XML Schema documents similar to the
> > mappings produced by the corresponding functions above:

OK, that is what is in our SGML now.

> Sorry, that is completely wrong.

You did just email "sounds good", but were mistaken, right?

> Are you aware of what "XML Schema" is? Should that perhaps be explained in
> the docs?

Uh, it would be nice to explain it, yes. My guess it that the paragraph
is much too short and needs perhaps an addtional sentence, but I have no
clue what it should be.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-27 18:54:12 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-04-27 18:50:13 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation