From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feedback from recent training |
Date: | 2009-04-26 18:59:41 |
Message-ID: | 200904262059.41721.guillaume@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le dimanche 26 avril 2009 à 20:31:57, Simon Riggs a écrit :
> On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are.
> >
> > No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes
> > confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise them with the
> > non-array types, but thats likely to be messy.
>
> How about an extra radio button for Array/Non-Array? That removes the
> confusion.
>
> The appearance of alpha sort stops people from looking further down the
> list for other items.
I think Simon's right on the alphabetic sort. It's much simpler/user friendly.
I don't like the extra radio button idea, but what about submenus? something
like this:
First menu
Types
Array Types
User types
"Types" Submenu
(all internal types and pseudo-types, sorted alphabetically)
"Array Types" Submenu
(the same, but array ones, sorted alphabetically)
"User Types" Submenu
(user tables and user types)
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-04-26 19:02:06 | Re: Feedback from recent training |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-04-26 18:31:57 | Re: Feedback from recent training |