Re: Dead link

From: Jeff MacDonald <jam(at)zoidtechnologies(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dead link
Date: 2009-04-24 21:17:15
Message-ID: 200904241717.15602.jam@zoidtechnologies.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Friday 24 April 2009 15:53:03 Mike Ellsworth wrote:
[...snipped...]
> > There are plenty of others that claim support but are hosting only, and
> > many that have no mention of Postgres anywhere on their site. Time for
> > a house cleaning?
>
> My opinion, yes.
> Should apply the same level of scrutiny that (example) Training receives.
> I would think it's a little befuddling for someone searching for a PG
> Host to find a dead end. Makes all the others suspect.

Agreed. How does one quality to be a "PG Host"? Would they need to offer some
level of support for PG specifically?

Regards,
J

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-27 02:55:18 SVN broken?
Previous Message Mike Ellsworth 2009-04-24 19:53:03 Re: Dead link