Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax

From: "steven king" <vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net
Subject: Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax
Date: 2009-04-21 20:48:13
Message-ID: 20090421204813.158820@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:53:54 -0400
> Von: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> An: steven king <vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de>
> CC: listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax

> Of course if you just want to make a simple tool,

look your (?) idea for range-partitioning ... that solution is (in principle) very close to "my" constraints.

the difference is, that I added the possability to evaluate "logical ranges" (-> values) before deciding the partition to be used.

not more ...

--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2009-04-21 20:51:23 Re: [ADMIN] License Issue
Previous Message Mikko 2009-04-21 20:32:18 Re: trouble with to_char('L')