Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt
Date: 2009-04-10 19:46:06
Message-ID: 200904102246.07602.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Friday 10 April 2009 21:27:54 Stephen Frost wrote:
> I agree with this. Avoiding spoofing is good, but so is on the wire
> encryption even if you don't have anti-spoofing. This is a reasonable
> set-up and we shouldn't just fail on it.

This whole debate hinges on the argument that encryption without anti-spoofing
is *not* useful.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-04-10 19:50:00 Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-04-10 19:44:44 Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt